Key points
- Domestic Relations Law section 240 directs courts to decide custody as justice requires, with regard to the best interests of the child.
- The Appellate Division has said a parent's mental health is necessarily relevant in custody cases but not determinative.
- In Armstrong v Heilker (2008), the Family Court sent the mother's records only to the court for in camera review, and the appellate court held that any forensic evaluator had to be independent or neutral, not chosen by the other parent.
- Family Court Act section 262 gives parents in Family Court custody cases a right to assigned counsel if they cannot afford a lawyer.
- HIPAA allows a provider to release records for a court case under a court order or, for a subpoena, only with specific written assurances.
Parents with ADHD who are going through a divorce or a custody case in New York often worry that the diagnosis, or the medication, will be used against them. New York courts decide custody by the child's best interests, and a parent's mental health is one thing they may look at. A diagnosis is not the deciding factor on its own. This page explains the legal standard, how courts treat a parent's mental health and treatment records, and practical steps, as of October 2026. It is general information, not legal advice. A family law attorney can tell you how these rules apply to your case.
The standard: the best interests of the child
In divorce and custody actions, New York Domestic Relations Law section 240 directs the court to enter custody orders as, in its discretion, justice requires, having regard to the circumstances of the case and of the parties and to the best interests of the child. Family Court custody cases under Family Court Act article 6 apply the same best-interests test.
Appellate courts describe the factors this way. In a 2024 decision, the Appellate Division, Third Department, said Family Court must consider factors such as the quality of each parent's home environment, the need for stability in the child's life, each parent's willingness to promote a positive relationship between the child and the other parent, and each parent's past performance, relative fitness and ability to provide for the child's intellectual and emotional development and overall well-being.
Notice what is on that list: how a parent actually functions as a parent. A diagnosis is not on it.
How a parent's mental health comes into a custody case
The Third Department put it directly in a 2008 case: "Although not determinative, the mental health of a parent is necessarily relevant in every custody/visitation proceeding." In practice that means a parent's ADHD can be raised, but the question is how it affects parenting, not whether the label exists.
The best-interests factors above point to what courts examine: the home environment, stability, past performance and the ability to meet a child's needs. A parent with ADHD who handles routines, school, appointments and safety reliably is showing exactly those things.
Can the other side get my mental health records?
New York protects communications with physicians, nurses, and psychologists by statute:
- Physicians and nurses. Under CPLR 4504, unless the patient waives the privilege, a physician or nurse may not disclose information acquired in treating a patient that was necessary to provide that treatment.
- Psychologists. CPLR 4507 places communications with a licensed psychologist on the same basis as those between attorney and client.
Custody cases are a setting where those protections can give way. In the 2008 Third Department case, Matter of Armstrong v Heilker, the Family Court first ordered a mother's mental health records sent only to the court for its private (in camera) review, before deciding what else to do. The appellate court then held that if a forensic mental health evaluation was needed, the court had to choose an independent or neutral psychiatrist or psychologist, not an expert picked by the other parent. The court also had to decide which records that professional would see, what access the parties and lawyers would have to the report, how it would be used at trial, and who would pay.
Two practical points follow:
- Court-ordered evaluations. Family Court Act section 251 lets the court order a parent to be examined by a physician, psychiatrist or psychologist appointed or designated by the court. These forensic evaluations are separate from treatment, and the evaluator works for the court, not for you.
- Subpoenas to your clinician. Under the federal HIPAA Privacy Rule, a provider may disclose health information in a court proceeding in response to a court order, limited to what the order expressly authorizes, or in response to a subpoena only with certain written assurances about notice to the patient or a qualified protective order (45 CFR 164.512(e)). A subpoena on its own does not automatically release your chart. Ask your attorney before you or your clinician respond to anything.
Day to day, your clinician still generally needs your written authorization to share records with anyone outside your care. The general rules are in who can see your ADHD diagnosis in New York.
When the dispute is about a child's ADHD
Disagreements about a child's ADHD treatment can themselves change a custody arrangement. In Matter of Michael T. v Dana U. (2024), the parents shared joint legal custody but disagreed about giving the child prescribed ADHD medication at school. The Third Department agreed that their inability to agree on medication and school decisions was a change in circumstances, and upheld an order keeping joint legal custody while giving the mother final decision-making authority on health, education and welfare when the parents could not agree.
Dr. Shershow's practice sees adults only, so questions about a child's evaluation or medication belong with the child's own clinician.
Practical steps for a parent with ADHD
- Get a lawyer, even if money is tight. Under Family Court Act section 262, a parent seeking custody or contesting a substantial infringement of custody in Family Court has the right to counsel, including court-assigned counsel if the parent cannot afford one.
- Keep treatment steady. Stopping or changing treatment because of a court case can make day-to-day functioning harder. Make medication decisions with your prescriber, not around court dates.
- Know what is in your own records. New York Public Health Law section 18 gives you the right to inspect and get copies of your own medical records, with limited exceptions. See ADHD documentation for work, school and exams for what a summary letter usually contains.
- Ask for accommodations in court if you need them. The New York State Unified Court System follows the Americans with Disabilities Act and has a request process for accommodations, with local ADA coordinators.
- Use systems that show reliability. Shared calendars, written handoff schedules and reminders for school and medical appointments help with ADHD and also make parenting time easier to document. Ideas are in parenting when you have ADHD.
| Concern | What the law or courts say |
|---|---|
| Will my ADHD diagnosis decide custody? | No single factor decides. A parent's mental health is relevant but "not determinative." |
| Can my therapist or psychiatrist be forced to testify? | Privileges exist (CPLR 4504, 4507), but courts can review records and order evaluations in custody cases. |
| Who does a court-ordered evaluation? | A professional the court appoints or designates (Family Court Act 251), not one chosen by the other parent. |
| Can I get a lawyer if I cannot pay? | In Family Court custody cases, parents have a right to assigned counsel if they cannot afford one (Family Court Act 262). |
Where Dr. Shershow's practice fits
Dr. John C. Shershow, M.D. is a psychiatrist who focuses on adult ADHD and sees adults located in New York or New Jersey for evaluation, treatment planning, medication management when appropriate and ongoing follow-up. A treating psychiatrist's role is your care. A court-ordered custody evaluation is a different, forensic role. If you are in a custody case and have questions about records or letters, call the office to ask how requests are handled, and speak with your attorney first. If ADHD has never been formally evaluated, a careful evaluation by an adult ADHD psychiatrist can clarify what is and is not going on. For related rights questions, see ADHD and professional licenses in New York.
Questions
Can I lose custody because I have ADHD?
A diagnosis alone does not decide custody in New York. Courts weigh the child's best interests, including each parent's home environment, stability, past performance and ability to meet the child's needs. A parent's mental health is relevant but not determinative.
Can my ex get my psychiatric records in a custody case?
Possibly, but not automatically. Physician and psychologist privileges apply, and courts often review records privately first or order a neutral, court-appointed evaluation. Talk to your attorney before any records are released.
Does taking ADHD medication look bad in court?
New York's custody standard does not single out ADHD or its treatment. Courts apply the best-interests factors, which focus on how a parent functions and meets the child's needs. Make medication decisions with your prescriber, not around court dates.
Will my psychiatrist do my custody evaluation?
Usually not. Under Family Court Act section 251, the court appoints or designates the examiner, and the Appellate Division has held the evaluator should be independent, neutral or agreed upon. Treating clinicians and forensic evaluators have different roles.
What if the other parent and I disagree about our child's ADHD medication?
Courts have treated an inability to agree on a child's ADHD medication as a change in circumstances that can justify changing custody terms, such as giving one parent final medical decision-making. A family law attorney can advise on your situation.
Sources
- New York State Senate: Domestic Relations Law section 240
- NY Courts (Law Reporting Bureau): Matter of Michael T. v Dana U., 2024 NY Slip Op 05849 (3d Dept 2024)
- NY Courts (Law Reporting Bureau): Matter of Armstrong v Heilker, 2008 NY Slip Op 00324 (3d Dept 2008)
- New York State Senate: CPLR 4504, Physician, dentist, podiatrist, chiropractor and nurse
- New York State Senate: CPLR 4507, Psychologist
- New York State Senate: Family Court Act section 251, Medical examinations
- New York State Senate: Family Court Act section 262, Assignment of counsel for indigent persons
- New York State Senate: Public Health Law section 18, Access to patient information
- Cornell LII: 45 CFR 164.512(e), Disclosures for judicial and administrative proceedings
- New York State Unified Court System: Accessibility and the ADA
